Post by billIf you read his column yesterday
"Mayor Johnson was in Docklands this morning, encouraging Londoners to
volunteer with the Scouts. It's not the first time he's praised
uniformed youth organisations as a way of enfranchising inner-city
kids: “Scout troops and army cadets squads are the kind of gangs we
like. It's time to expand their turf,” he dib-dib-dibbed a couple of
years ago.
In the past I would have been cynical about this — my own Scout troop
was a jamboree of ultraviolence. However, as I learned from my recent
experience mentoring a 10-year-old boy, many disadvantaged children
have scant opportunity even to leave the home outside school hours.
Anything that can broaden horizons is to be encouraged — and there is
no reason why inner-city children will not enjoy traditional scouting
activities such as building fires, canoeing and beating each other up
with sticks. I just hope the new calibre of volunteer is able to exert
a little more discipline than the cheery sadists I remember."
Post by billyou'll see that he SAYS he was in an
organisation of "cheerful sadists"
He was relating his experiences
Post by billand that it was hyperviolent.He
says it was scouts.
I REALLY don't recognise either of these terms as representative of
scouting as I've known it.
But you're not him!
Post by billBy saying this sort of rubbish he is likely to put off adult
volunteers, in my view. I wish someone would invite him to see what
scouting is actually like -as opposed to scouting on Planet Godwin....
He says his cynicism is in the past. He's just expressing his view
that he hopes the kids of today get a better experience than he did in
his yesterdays.
He's entitled to his views.
Will the article put people off? No, I don't think so.
Does it give a detrimental view? No.
Could it be 'better'? Yes maybe but then it wouldn't be his personal
view, would it?
There are good troops and bad troops today just as there were
yesterday. He was - in his view - unlucky to be in a bad one.
Regards,
GAGS